Страница:
was illegally attached to ours to put us in dependence of her situation (Doc. 1, 4, 6).
(e). My mother's case. 1994: W. Brzezinska, M.D. for Immigration, makes an insincere report (Doc. 7a, 4b, 7b) about my mother's
health (eventual (!) development of cardiac and kidney insufficiency). (My mother told her that she was born with heart
augmentation). Nov. 1999: an immigration officer (M-me Roy), not a M.D. illegally intervenes in evaluation of the medical matters,
makes a decision based on it (Doc. 7a,7b). However, she quickly replaces that decision - recognizing my mother's marriage. In
violation of the marriage interview stage requirements IMS release a negative decision before med. exams (Doc. 7a). 2000: an entire
year of mockery, ungrounded orders for innumerable additional tests and exams, punitive threatening letters and calls. Goals: a) to
damage my mother's heath, b) clear dr. Brzezinska and M-me Roy (Doc. 14 -17). For two months after her "medical saga"
Immigration was refusing to give any answer/explanation. Now (Dec.) IMS made a final negative ruling, based on Mrs. Bezezinska's
insinuation in spite of new contradicting to it results and medical opinions (anatomy, not pathology). (Also dr. Brzezinska never in 5
years sent my mother for cardiac or kidney tests, or to cardiologist/urologist, and never prescribed her any medication for
heart/kidney problems). It is outraged that the whole year IMS was evaluating not actual but eventual health problems - and
confirmed initial inhuman decision! (Doc. 25). If the horrible diagnosis (Doc. 25a), with which they crucified my mother, were correct,
how could she live a normal life all 6 years without medications and cardiologist? If my mother's heath declined after one year of
humiliations - Immigration officials must be fully responsible for that. This is what they did it to punish me!
Actions to influence or even administratively invade medical institutions and personnel for extorting false medical reports, creation of
false medical documents were committed in both my mother's and my cases. Tricks with my x-ray, delivery of receipts or calls for
tests I've never done, other manipulations are threat to my own heath or even life! (Doc. 1-7, 9-25). Our children are tremendously
suffering from that situation as well as from artificial delays in extension of their student authorizations and other essential papers.
My wife and my mother became suicidal, nervous and suffering from depression.
I never received any answer to my letter to the Minister of Immigration (Nov. 1-6 2000) and to Immigration Complain Board (Nov. 30).
4. In spite of persecutions we have contributed to Canadian society as much as we could. We had no conflicts in civil life. We
worked. We have accommodated in spite of artificial obstacles - thanks to ordinary Canadians. Even in Federal Immigration some
people tried to compensate the damage, done to us by others. I have participated in tenth of musical festivals and events. My wife is
a hard worker. Our children are recognized talented musician and ballerina (OTHER PUBLICATIONS
http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo201127.html
http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo_updte02.html
http://www.amin.org/update/censor.htm
http://www.singer.ca/forum/imm/messages/821.html
http://www.kuero4/justice/gun.html
UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN SITUATION
UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN PERSECUTIONS
Manipulation of medical data for political persecutions is the end of the civilized society
- December 2000
C O N T E N T
1. List of documents
2. Complaint on Immigration actions and decisions
3. Complaint against refusal to allow medical examinations.
4. Disagreement with the decision of Imm.Med.Serv. from November 23, 2000.
5. Copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest Institute.
6. Short descriptions of events - end of 1999 - beginning of 2000
7. Lev GUNIN - "The Source Of Our Problems"
8. Wider detailed description of events before December (Sept. - Nov. 2000)
9. Resume of the visit to MCI December 4 2000.
10. The whole immigration story
11. Other English publications on Internet about persecution of family GUNIN
To Human Rights Organizations
(AI, HRW, UNHRC, etc.)
December, 2000. Montreal, QUEBEC
- Introductory Document
From Lev GUNIN Full immigration story: {www.total.net/~leog/Righs/LevGunin/indexX.htm}
former refugee claimant
(tel. 514-49-1294) December 2 2000
Introductory Note
1. Because violations and injustice are so outraged and unbelievable that it is difficult to speak
about them without emotions, I decided not to write a special description of events. Instead I
am handing you over a number of documents, which will speak for themselves.
2. Below I am listing these documents with comments and explanations about each.
Manipulation and falsification of medical data is the most dangerous and tremendous violation
of human rights. Most letters from Immigration were anonymous, but only few marked here on
that regard as examples.
Document 1:
Complaint on Immigration actions and decisions submitted to Immigration Complain Board
(like attempts to cause damage to victim's heath). Theoretically falsification and blatant
manipulation of medical data can lead to a forcible treatment from diseases, which one do not
have (it could be lethal).
Document 2:
Complaint against refusal to allow all my family members medical examinations.
Document 3:
My disagreement with the decision of Imm.Med.Serv. from November 23, 2000.
Document 4-a:
A shortened description of events, which manifested abuse of power, ungrounded secrecy,
misconduct and criminal manipulation of medical data. Document 4-b is a supplementary
description about the source of my problems. It is crucial for understanding the mechanism
behind the persecutions.
Document 5:
Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest Institute.
Document 6:
A wider description of events, with more astonishing and outraged details. This document is
not enclosed but available on Internet: {www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo201127.html}
Document 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d:
M-me Roy's rulings: illegal intervention into medical matters by non-medic, violation of the
procedural requirements of the marriage interview stage, prejudicial ruling of IMS before my
mother's medical exams for the landed immigrant status.
Document 8:
Complaint to Immigration about extension's of employment authorization sabotage from May
15 2000.
Document 9:
Resume of my visit to MCI December 4 2000.
Document 10-a
The anonymous letter from MCI mentioned in Documents 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Document 10-b:
another letter (one page) demanding a donation to the Royal Victoria Hospital was included in
the same envelope as the "TB letter".
Document 11
An order-receipt (payment) to pay for the blood test for syphilis, which was never done.
Another document (Document 12) shows that dr. Giannalis uses this laboratory to evaluate
test samples, taken at his office. The blood test for syphilis was not required by Immigration in
my case. It was also mentioned that a patient must only appear for this test in the CDL
Laboratories, in other words samples taken outside CDL Lab are not admitting for evaluation
for syphilis.
Document 12
Strum creatinine test's form from CDL Lab form for my mother. The test was ordered by dr.
Giannakis on Immigration's request and the result was: in norm.
Document 13-a
Front page of the IMS ruling from November 23 letter (received on November 28).
Corresponds to Document 3. Also was mentioned in Documents 1, 4, 6. Document 13-b is the
text of the internal part of the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
Document 14-a
Ruling from IMS to my mother, Elisabetha Epstein from January 17 2000. This document is
anonymous, no names, telephone numbers. Document 14-b is the text of the internal part of
the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
Document 15-a
Ruling from IMS to my mother, Elisabetha Epstein from June 30 2000. This document is
anonymous, no names, telephone numbers. Document 15-b is the text of the internal part of
the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
Document 15 plus
September 2000 - letter from IMS ordering another urine test and then a visit to an urologist.
Document 16
An offensive letter from my mother's new immigration officer from September 18 2000.
Document 17
My mother's, Elisabetha Epstein, response (September 20 2000) to an offensive letter from
Immigration (see Document 16).
Document 18
Copy of the positive response to our humanitarian appeal
Document 19
An order from January 11 2000 to my wife, Alla, to undergo the medical examination. Only my
wife's name mentioned in this letter. This letter is a proof that refusing to include all family
members Immigration stalling the completion of our file almost one year now.
Document 20
An order from October 26 2000 to me and my daughter Marta to undergo medical
examination. Was submitted in contradiction with the previous Immigration's assurance that
only my wife has to undergo medical examination.
Document 21-a
X-ray result from Le Centre Radiologique Clarke from November 14 2000, which tremendously
contradict the Immigration's x-ray from November 01 2000 evaluation. In response to TB
double-check request (see Document 21-b) it said "NIL ACTIVE". The film was evaluated by 3
medical doctors, which came to the same "nil active" conclusion. I was seen and evaluated by
2 medical doctors since October 29, who found the TB suspicion ridiculous.
Document 22
X-ray result from November 22 1994 from the Centre Hospitalier Reddy Memorial. On request
of W. Brzezinska, M.D. if there is recent pulmonary infiltrate it said "no recent pulmonary
infiltrate shown".
Document 23
Mr. Z. JAST's certificate for Immigration in relation to the x-ray dispute.
Document 24
Internet-links to two publications, which might accelerate persecutions.
Document 25-a,b
IMS final decision in my mother's case from Dec. 5 2000.
Document 26
Document 27
List of "civil" events. Relates to our will to contribute to the society.
Lev GUNIN December 2 2000 Montreal
COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER ONE
To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) November 30 2000
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
This is the complaint on actions and decisions, which my advisers and I found inadmissible, like
attempts to cause damage to my mother's and my heath. Theoretically falsification and blatant
manipulation of medical data can lead to a forcible treatment from diseases, which one do not
have (it could be lethal).
.
I submit you 5 documents. The First is this one. Second is a complaint against refusal to allow
all my family members medical examinations half a year ago. Third is my disagreement with the
decision of Immigration Health Services from November 23, 2000. Fourth is a shortened
description of events, which manifested abuse of power, ungrounded secrecy, misconduct and
criminal manipulation of medical data. Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest
Institute. Sixth is a wider description of events, with more astonishing and outraged details.
However, because of the length of the Sixth document its submission by fax could be found
offensive, so, please, tell me where to send it by post or e-mail.
I would like to know:
A) Who made all mentioned in six documents unjust decisions (names, position, what their role
in my file).
B) On what ground (law, paragraph, circumstances).
C) Who made a decision, based on a single x-ray: to consider me a potential TB carrier and
submitted it not to Mr. Giannakis, M.D. but to the Royal Victoria Hospital, depriving me and
doctor Giannakis of a minimal choice to choose where to turn for further evaluation. Is the MCI
radiology unit a part of IMS (ImmMedSrv)?
D) If the x-ray film (made at MCI) could be obtained for copying. My legal advisers and me - we
want to ask you to show it to us at 1010 St Antoine, Montreal. We want to check:
E) If a) there is any technical defect or underwear shadow, which was offensively interpreted
as "TB" b) this x-ray matches my body constitution c) an obviously normal result was blatantly
interpreted as "abnormal". We would like to be given a permission to take this film or its copy to
medical specialists to determine it.
F) How all contradictions, deceptions, violations can be explained (each event).
G) Examples: a) Half a year ago IMS officials refused to submit us ruling and forms for medical
examination for all family members assuring us that only my wife has to go through them. Now
in contradiction with what was said before they ordered my younger daughter and me (now
omitting my older daughter) to do examinations. B) Why my mother's file was illegally attached
to mine. c) How could so many ungrounded medical tests be ruled for my mother, keeping her
more then one year (!) in limbo, etc.
H) How all such decisions might be appealed?
I) Has my mother and me same IMS agents or agents of the same unit? Who are supervisors
of all agents, attached to our files (including Immigration Medical Services - IMS).
J) How to reach them?
K) If Immigration's agents (IMS included) are subjects of Criminal Code - or they are
completely uncontrolled and impunitive.
L) If they are not (impunitive) what is the way to complain about
1. Deliberate damage of my (my family's) financial, social, and psychological situation.
2. Criminal manipulation of the medical data
M) How could I know if W. Brzezinska's M.D. rapport with a "concern" about my health
presents not only in my mother's but in my file as well?
N) Why my file is proceeding not on Montreal - as normally - but in Ottawa?
I must warn you that I will contact police or RCMP in case of any further anonymous calls
("private call" indication) from Immigration and will disregard any letters, until they will not be
signed and carry the name and phone number of the person who is responsible for the
decision. All anonymous telephone calls, which accuse me of concealing a number of
infectious diseases, must be stopped. Anonymous letters from hospitals on behalf of
Immigration with same insinuations are unacceptable as well. I have also received a receipt for
a blood test for syphilis, which I never did, from a Lab, where I never went. I was also called by
two other laboratories, which pretend that I did tests for infectious diseases, and this is not
true. All such provocation must be stopped immediately!
.
All 5 (or 6) documents must be evaluated to consider and answer my complaint. Please,
answer all questions, which arise from the documents. I ask you to respond to this complaint in
writing. However, another solution is just to consider my case as "finished" with no further
demands. Will appreciate your cooperation.
Yours,
Lev GUNIN
November 30 2000
Chronology in GUNINS' case
November 1994
refugee claim
March 1997
refugee claim rejected.
(In the negative decision our refugee
claim description was severely
distorted; document includes such
direct and indirect statements as a)
nothing bad could happen in such a
beautiful country like Israel, b) people
who were taken to Israel for
Sochnut's expense are property of
Israel, c) people who refused to
change their believes and opinions
are guilty on persecutions themselves
because provoked them c) no
minimum of confidence). January
1998
- Federal Court closing our case on a
ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no
minimal confidence" ruling.
January 2000
- positive decision in response to our
humanitarian appeal.
March 2000
an interview lead to the Certificat de
selectione du Quebec issuing by
Quebec's Immigration
March 2000
bureaucratic humiliation and blatant
manipulation of medical data by
Federal Immigration starts to torpid
the completion of the case
Chronology in
Elisabetha GUNIN (Epstein's)
case:.1994
refugee claim + Wanda Brzezinska,
M.D. makes a false report (see Doc.
4b, 7a, 7b).
March 1997
refugee claim rejected.
January 1998
- Federal Court closing our case on a
ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no
minimal confidence" ruling.
November 1998
marriages a Canadian citizen
November 22 1999
my mother's marriage interview.
Nov. 23, Madame Helene ROY
replaces the initiative negative
decision, based on "medical
concerns" (dr. Brzezinska's rapport),
by a positive one.
January 2000 - Certificat de
selectione du Quebec was issued for
my mother.
January 2000, a ruling from IMS
ordering my mother additional tests:
strum creatinine (blood test) and
echocardiogram.
June 30, 2000 - IMS ridiculous
demand of a resume from "the last
visit to cardiologist".
July 27 2000
- rapport of Dr. Gordon Creenstein
(anatomy, not pathology) was
submitted to Immigration.
September 2000
another letter from IMS ordering
another urine test and then a visit to
an urologist.
September 19 2000
offensive letter from Immigration
officer. December 2000
IMS final negative decision confirming
the illegal prejudicial decision from
Nov. 99.
- DOCUMENT NUMBER TWO
To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237)
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
A COPY OF DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO IMMIGRATION
ON MAY 15 2000
By this letter we ask Immigration's agent assigned to my file to make a special ruling to order medical examinations for all members
of our family, not only for Alla GUNIN, my wife. As we know from our legal advisers, this procedure is required for all family members
for the landed immigrant's status. If you insist that only my wife has to do the medical examination, please, send us a written warrant.
We have a well-grounded suspicion that somebody might use the delay in ordering the medical examination for all members of our
family for artificial sabotage of issuing us the landed immigrant's status. We will appreciate your cooperation.
YOURS TRULY
Lev GUNIN
in name of family GUNIN
The 15 of May 2000
COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER THREE
To Immigration's Complaints Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) December 1 2000
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
I disagree with the Immigration Medical Services decision "ev 7001-850497Z" (with date mentioned: November 23, 2000) from
Ottawa, received by me on November 29, 2000 (anonymous - no name or signature). The goal of this ruling is not to establish the
medical truth but to put a hardship on my family (and me).
My arguments.
(See the decision's text - as it was red to me by dr. Giannakis - in Document N4: on the bottom)
1. The decision ruled that Mr. Giannakis's respond should be submitted before November 30, 2000. Why then the letter arrived only
on November 29? Does it mean that the date in the letter - "November 23" - was incorrect? Or the letter has not been sent in 2-3 days? Or - if it is known that a letter from Ottawa to Montreal goes 5-6 days - why then I was not given more time? I ask you to submit me an explanation what November 30 means and why not December 10 or January 15? I want to know how the agent justified that particular date. Was that small misconduct planned in advance?
2. The suggestion that somebody else went and did the x-ray instead of me was another serious assault. That suggestion was made in ignorance of the fact that on Clark Lab's official (original!) paper IMS (Immigration Medical Service) officer could see my name, date of birth, telephone number, name of the ordering physician, and the number of my medical card (which - everybody knows - has my photo on it). Besides, it mentioned the "MILD PECTUS EXCAVATUM", a cosmetic defect, which I have since birth. Besides, it is known that the film itself has a negative image of the whole ID data! Then this ungrounded abuse was based on nothing and went far beyond any medical or even legal matter.
3. The demand to send an original film from the November 14 x-ray in the light of two above disputed demands might be ungrounded. This x-ray film was already seen by 3 medical doctors: the radiologist at the Clark Lab, dr. Jast (who referred me and evaluated the film), and dr. Giannakis. All three came to a conclusion that there is NOTHING abnormal, not a slightest possibility.
Both dr. Jast and Giannakis also examined me. The official conclusion is NIL ACTIVE. Besides, it was informally evaluated by a chest specialist: with the same conclusion. What else the IMS agent needs? I have a well-grounded concern that 1) he/she will find a black spot even on the whitest paper - because he/she is determined to; and 2) after he/she will find "a black spot" the film will vanish, but not the IMS's "evaluation". Immigration pretended already many times (dates, documents might be provided) that lost our applications, medical data, etc.
4. It was an abuse to mention that "After overview if necessary applicant may have to be referred to the chest specialist." It is a prejudgment and prejudice. "...if necessary", "may" are just a form. It is a very clear message that he/she will not let me alone! Why to speak about next medical procedure before seeing the x-ray?
Lev GUNIN Dec. 01 2000
Copy - DOCUMENT NUMBER FIVE
From Lev GUNIN ( 514-499-1294)
Document 5
LETTER TO THE MONTREAL CHEST INSTITUTE - A Copy
(The letter was submitted on November 09 in respond to an anonymous letter from the Montreal Chest Institute received on November 6 2000; below you can find a modified version (November 12-14), which was submitted to the same destination on November 15).
.
Lev GUNIN
address
telephone
From Lev GUNIN to anonymous person, author of the letter (the copy of the letter is enclosed).
Montreal Chest Institute
3666 St-Urbain
Montreal, QUEBEC H2X 2P4
Sir or Lady! Please, forward this letter to an appropriate Immigration department, which you mentioned on page 1 of your letter.
First of all, any suggestions that I could be infected by tuberculosis were ridiculous. I had some other suggestions, but later a medical doctor I spoke to - as well as my legal advisers - told me that the only answer of what happened is that Immigration might just make a false report on my x-ray. Besides, a x-ray could not determine whether or not any of such shadow means tuberculosis, or simply any kind of pneumonia, bronchitis, or a combination (see medical books). Any conclusions based on only one x-ray are ridiculous, partial, and prejudicial. In modern time - when there are so many flu infections accompanied by pneumonic consequences (side effects) such conclusions are a complete nonsense. It is obvious that your decision to attach me to the Infectious Disease Unit (IDU) before you have a 100 percent proof of any tuberculosis infection and initiate an appropriate legal procedure was a drastic misconduct. The only admissible way to handle the situation was (before sending me to the Infectious Disease Unit)
1) to request a second opinion in existing x-ray
2) to send me a letter for my physician for another x-ray.
On November 14 I did another x-ray. It revealed that there is no any suspicious shadow, no abnormalities - and (as my medical advisers told) could not be 2 weeks before, especially tuberculosis-like shadows. Was my x-ray photo (a negative) replaced by somebody else's or IMS (Immigration Medical Services) just falsified the reading of my x-rays, - I do not know. That all is a subject of a criminal investigation.
Because I am depressed, I did not notice that the Montreal Chest Institute (MCI) belongs to Royal Victoria Hospital, an institution I had several formal conflicts with. Somebody from the hospital's administration used to submit me an offensive number of requests for donation to the hospital even after I have sent a note that by then was on welfare. The hospital's administration also did an attempt to extort money from me for services, which were covered by Medicare. In that hospital I heard several times that people like me are "illegal in Canada and should not be given medical help "for the cost of Canadians". Then I was treated by negligence at the emergency room, then - it was a medical misconduct over my CSST claim. Dr. Evenson's M.D. (Royal Victoria) secretary played games with me, actually denying an appointment from May till November 2000. A number of legal and medical violations used to take place there. And in all such minor incidents immigration matters or even Immigration itself were involved. One of immigration specialists advised me not to turn to Royal Victoria because that hospital is "enormously influenced by Immigration".
The fact that a page with a request for a donation to the Royal Victoria Hospital was included into your letter was another outraged abuse.
Eventually it is possible that doctor Giannakis had sent me for x-ray not to "La Cite" - as my mom and my wife, - or another medical institution but to Montreal Chest Institute because he received an order (not a request but an order, which he could not disobey as an Immigration representative) from Immigration to do so.
By this letter I declare that I am considering your way of handling the situation dangerously offensive and depriving me of my constitutional rights because of the above mentioned as well as the next reasons:
FIRST, I will DISREGARD any anonymous letters like your present one until a letter from you would be signed, addressed from a real person with his/her clear name and telephone number.
SECOND, you have no legal rights to treat me as a contagious carrier until an undeniable medical proof is established.
THIRD, by sending me to the IDU you may expose me to contacts with real infected carriers.
FOURTH, you are not a police, Immigration, secret police or death squads to a) act secretly-anonymously refusing to sign your letter,
b) to write me anything like "by Immigration law, you are requested (...)". Since you are not immigration layers or Immigration officials, you are forbidden to judge in a case like mine what Immigration law requires. Such a statement in a case like mine must be submitted only directly from Immigration. If you are part of Immigration (officially) - then my rights were violated when I wasn't informed about that before doing the x-ray at your unit.
FIFTH, my legal advisors, and me, we are confident that you have no legal rights to deprive me of choosing between medical institutions for medical tests or evaluation. You can not bring me to do a test or an evaluation exclusively in your institution by a forceful order. This will violate my basic human rigDocument 5hts. Even KGB had no official rights to oblige anybody who was not an imprisoned suspect or convinced criminal to do a medical evaluation without some sort of choice.
SIXTH, I would ask Immigration to allow me do another x-ray before doing anything else.
SEVENTH, evaluating my case, some human rights activists think that somebody at Immigration is so furious, so angry about me and that such an outraged misconduct was demonstrated in my case that Immigration is eventually ready to do any damage to my health through blood, e-ray tests or sadistic bureaucratic humiliations.
EIGHTH, I think that the most realistic explanations of an eventual abnormality, which could be seen on the x-ray picture, were:
1) eventual shadow from the underwear, which I did not remove from on beneath of the hospital robe, and the robe itself, which I've putted on in a wrong way
2) a dust spot or another kind of essence on the hospital robe
3) traces of somehow inhaled gas different from air
4) reading of a normal x-ray (with no abnormalities) was deliberately falsified by IMS
NINTH, before doing the e-ray I received a strange call from Immigration, through which I was accused of refusing a "medical treatment".
TENTH, your medical ethics should not allow you to send me to the IDU before making your own medical conclusions (decision) based not on Immigration's rapport but of your own evaluation of my x-ray test result.
ELEVENTH, my legal advisors have told me that I have rights to ask for a possibility to discuss my x-ray result with any of your medical institution specialists dedicated to such evaluations before going further. It is you (on behalf of Immigration or not - it is does not matter) who are sending me to Infectious Disease Unit. Because you are sending me to such a unit, you can not deny me such a discussion. I would like to see the x-ray original, which was made in your institution on November 1 2000 - and also show Document
5it to my medical advisors.
TWELVETH, I prefer not to go through further tests or evaluations in immigration matters (for medical purposes - it's different) at your institution.
Yours truly,
Lev GUNIN
November 2000 Montreal
- Document Number Nine
RESUME of my visit to Montreal Chest Institute on December 2 2000
OBJECT Of the Visit:
1) to receive an official result (medical resume-evaluation) of my x-ray test done on November 1 2000
2) find out where is the original film and try to obtain it for making a copy
REASONS:
November 23 2000. I have managed to find out who sent me the anonymous letter (described in Documents 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6) from
Montreal Chest Institute (MCI). It was M-me Lucy Gefroy (Jefroi or Joyfroid?). According to the same sources: she's never seen that x-ray. I left her my message on 849-5211 (ex 2166). She called me at 2.15 p.m. anonymously ("private call" indication) - and asked me what I want. She confessed that she is M-me Lucy only when I told her that recognized her voice comparing it to her answering machine message. That only could tell about her insincerity and guilt. I spoke with her in French, but when I did not know some medical terminology in French, and used English, she pretended that does not speak English at all. However, when I switched to French again, she started to speak bad English, which I could not understand. It was difficult to get along with her, but finally I convinced her to speak French again - and asked her a couple of questions.
Here they are:
- Did you see the x-ray?
- Yes, I did.
- What kind of a shadow did you see, mild? bright? what its form? On the right or left side?
- I can not tell you.
- Where is this x-ray film now?
- I can not tell you.
- Is it at MCI?
- Immigration took it from us, and, I think, it was lost.
- What do you mean - lost?
- Vanished somewhere at Immigration.
- Can I obtain the result?
- Listen, your case here is closed. You don't have to come here. Not any more. We disabled our previous letter's order. Bye.
She disconnected.
RESULTS of the visit.
At MCI's medical archive employers did not find any records about my x-ray in the computer. They told me that a mistake might
occur - because if even I did the x-ray for Immigration, its data (result, date, etc.) since November 1 had to be entered into the
registry.
Before I could enter room number 28 a small blond man appeared and approached me as in espionage novels (how could he
react so quickly, who warned him during my descending from the second to the first floor?) "You will receive nothing here. And you will be prosecuted for refusing to see the doctor, - he shouted to me. "I was told that my x-ray has vanished, and came to check, and also to obtain the result". He became almost pale - so visually he was frightened, as if he lost a million of dollars. He disappeared behind the gray door and soon came out with an envelope (my name and photo on it) and signs of a deep relief. "Here it is, - he told.
- You must visit a doctor because you have tuberculosis". "Are you confident about TB you mentioned?" - "Yes, I am". - "I was told that my case here is cancelled - and I don't have to appear". - "Nobody could tell you that. You will be prosecuted for your refusal!"
"Your conclusions about the x-ray was a mistake, Sir, and the film reveals a technical defect or a shadow of underwear, which I did not remove. Take a look - and let me see". - "It is possible. But the law says that you must see a doctor anyway, if even this is our mistake". - "What law, what paragraph? Then - I have a constitutional right to choose another institution, not yours, to pay such a visit". Then he started screaming on me: "You don't want to pay, ah? You don't want to donate to our hospital? You came to Canada and want to enjoy our good life without giving anything back? If you don't pay by your fucken money - you'll pay by your fucken ass!" - I tried to say "This is not only because of money, this is because I can not trust you!" but he kept screaming on me - and I left him. Before I left the hospital I could find out that there is no official result in my case. No paper, no evaluation. Only a checkpoint on the envelope, in category "4". What if somebody just made a wrong hand movement - and checked a wrong place?
I did not go to MCI any more. Later I discovered through other ways that the category 4 means "pulmonary noodles", which was completely inapplicable to me!
RESUME: Anyone can see that drastic misconduct toward me (or in general), and hatred towards me (or towards all
immigration-seekers in general?) could explain what's going on in that institution and what happened around my x-ray.
REMARK: This is not a documentary story. To show the emotional impression I have distorted some small details. This is more like a literary piece. However, it is precise in revealing what we are dealing with. Also the words of Madam Lucy and Mister Doctor were cited with a precise accuracy.
Yours truly,
Lev GUNIN
Лев Гунин. Приложения к работе "ГУЛАГ ПАЛЕСТИНЫ"
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ ВТОРОЕ
ГЛОБАЛЬНЫЙ ТЕРОР ПРОТИВ ВСЕХ
НЕСОГЛАСНЫХ С СИОНИСТКОЙ ИДЕОЛОГИЕЙ
В своей статье в "CANADIAN JEWISH NEWS" "WHY I AM ANTI-ANTI-ZIONIST" (июнь, 2001) один из главных сионистских идеологов Канады, активист, журналист, постоянный корреспондент монреальской "THE GAZETTE", приравнял несогласие с идеологией современного сионизма
к антисемитизму, враждебному отношению к Израилю и даже терроризму. Подобная позиция высказывается с начала 1990-х годов израильскими лидерами и лидерами мирового еврейства, главными еврейскими газетами мира и наиболее влиятельными еврейскими экстремистами. В статье "Internet the New Domain of Middle East Conflict" в газете "Canadian Jewish news" (December, 2000) намеренно сваливаются в кучу какая бы то ни была критика Израиля в Интернет, подрывная деятельность и хакерские демарши. "Безобидные" взломы израильских вэб сайтов, в результате которых не пострадал ни один человек, идеологическая борьба с сионизмом в легальных рамках, частная критика государства Израиль в Интернет - все объявляется "сибер-терроризмом", приравнивается к терроризму уголовному (к взрыву бомб - и т.д.), вслед за чем следует обещание военного ответа Израиля. От имени еврейского государства статья в этом официальном органе еврейских властей Канады обещает военный ответ на любую критику государства Израиль. Еще более вопиющим звучит признание в том, что израильская военная машина стоит за "контрпропагандой" и за деятельностью про-израильских хакеров. При этом враждебные Израилю хакеры объявляются террористами, а израильские хакеры героями! Эта статья - открытое запугивание всех, кто осмеливается критиковать политику и идеологию государства Израиль в Интернет. Можно не сомневаться, что это официальная точка зрения как самих израильских властей, так и еврейских лидеров диаспоры на сегодняшний день.
Таким образом, ситуация менялась так: сначала (еще совсем недавно - в 1970-х) считалось "необязательным", чтобы все евреи поголовно были ярыми сионистами. Потом для того, чтобы оставаться в рамках еврейской общинной жизни, стало требоваться скрывать свое несогласие с сионистской идеологией или даже выражать свои сионистские взгляды. И, наконец, теперь быть сионистами обязательно не только для евреев, но и для не евреев тоже, в противном случае тебе грозят серьезные неприятности. Итак, еврейский тоталитаризм завершил свою эволюции, развившись к настоящему времени в свою крайнюю форму, с тенденцией к мировому контролю и тотальному промыванию мозгов. Наиболее символичный демарш еврейских экстремистов - суд и глумление над британским историком Дэйвидом Ирвингом.
В следующем тексте на английском языке речь идет о мировом заговоре еврейских экстремистов, охвативших тотальным контролем все средства массовой информации, академические учреждения, издательства, Интернет, и так далее, с целью не допустить ни появления ни одной книги, ни одной статьи, ни одного комментария, ни одного вэб сайта, расходящихся с официальной сионистской доктриной по любому ряду вопросов, представляющему для сионизма тот или иной интерес: по истории, религии, археологии, политологии, и так далее. Речь идет о мировой сионистской цензуре. Своих целей сионисты добиваются через суды, травлю авторов, избиения, убийства, запугивания, подкуп, преследования. Такие еврейские экстремистские организации как Анти-Дефамационная Лига, Лига Защиты Евреев, Бней Брит, Институт Против Терроризма, а также организации "общего" типа, такие, как Всемирный Еврейский Конгресс и другие, занимаются отслеживанием, выявлением всех, не согласных с современной официальной сионистской идеологией, составлением досье на этих людей, и в дальнейшем - преследованием последних. Те, кто открыто выражает свое несогласие с сионистской идеологией, сталкиваются с разными неприятностями: с объявлением их фашистами, с выдвинутыми против них еврейскими организациями судебными исками, с отстранением от работы (особенно в академических кругах), с запретом на их публикации, с депортацией из той или иной страны или с запретом на въезд в ту или иную страну, и так далее. Все это мы узнаем из следующего текста, помещенного про-демократическим сайтом Mowchuk, который принадлежит активисту Мани Саиду.
Помещение следующих материалов нами не означает, что мы согласны со всеми их взглядами и позициями, но ситуация настолько осложнилась и еврейский мировой тоталитаризм настолько укрепился, что любое, альтернативное ему, мнение, имеет право на то, чтобы быть узнанным. Из верности демократическим принципам мы также даем некоторые материалы, связанные с альтернативным нашему мнением. По ним читатель может составить свое впечатление об уровне и накале идеологической борьбы, какая может быть вполне сравнима с накалом холодной войны. Разница только в том, что в холодной войне друг другу противостояли государства. А в холодной войне, развязанной современным сионизмом, государства Запада стоят не на стороне своих граждан - жертв сионистской агрессии и цензуры, а на стороне злейшего врага европейской культуры: государства Израиль.
(e). My mother's case. 1994: W. Brzezinska, M.D. for Immigration, makes an insincere report (Doc. 7a, 4b, 7b) about my mother's
health (eventual (!) development of cardiac and kidney insufficiency). (My mother told her that she was born with heart
augmentation). Nov. 1999: an immigration officer (M-me Roy), not a M.D. illegally intervenes in evaluation of the medical matters,
makes a decision based on it (Doc. 7a,7b). However, she quickly replaces that decision - recognizing my mother's marriage. In
violation of the marriage interview stage requirements IMS release a negative decision before med. exams (Doc. 7a). 2000: an entire
year of mockery, ungrounded orders for innumerable additional tests and exams, punitive threatening letters and calls. Goals: a) to
damage my mother's heath, b) clear dr. Brzezinska and M-me Roy (Doc. 14 -17). For two months after her "medical saga"
Immigration was refusing to give any answer/explanation. Now (Dec.) IMS made a final negative ruling, based on Mrs. Bezezinska's
insinuation in spite of new contradicting to it results and medical opinions (anatomy, not pathology). (Also dr. Brzezinska never in 5
years sent my mother for cardiac or kidney tests, or to cardiologist/urologist, and never prescribed her any medication for
heart/kidney problems). It is outraged that the whole year IMS was evaluating not actual but eventual health problems - and
confirmed initial inhuman decision! (Doc. 25). If the horrible diagnosis (Doc. 25a), with which they crucified my mother, were correct,
how could she live a normal life all 6 years without medications and cardiologist? If my mother's heath declined after one year of
humiliations - Immigration officials must be fully responsible for that. This is what they did it to punish me!
Actions to influence or even administratively invade medical institutions and personnel for extorting false medical reports, creation of
false medical documents were committed in both my mother's and my cases. Tricks with my x-ray, delivery of receipts or calls for
tests I've never done, other manipulations are threat to my own heath or even life! (Doc. 1-7, 9-25). Our children are tremendously
suffering from that situation as well as from artificial delays in extension of their student authorizations and other essential papers.
My wife and my mother became suicidal, nervous and suffering from depression.
I never received any answer to my letter to the Minister of Immigration (Nov. 1-6 2000) and to Immigration Complain Board (Nov. 30).
4. In spite of persecutions we have contributed to Canadian society as much as we could. We had no conflicts in civil life. We
worked. We have accommodated in spite of artificial obstacles - thanks to ordinary Canadians. Even in Federal Immigration some
people tried to compensate the damage, done to us by others. I have participated in tenth of musical festivals and events. My wife is
a hard worker. Our children are recognized talented musician and ballerina (OTHER PUBLICATIONS
http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo201127.html
http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo_updte02.html
http://www.amin.org/update/censor.htm
http://www.singer.ca/forum/imm/messages/821.html
http://www.kuero4/justice/gun.html
UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN SITUATION
UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN PERSECUTIONS
Manipulation of medical data for political persecutions is the end of the civilized society
- December 2000
C O N T E N T
1. List of documents
2. Complaint on Immigration actions and decisions
3. Complaint against refusal to allow medical examinations.
4. Disagreement with the decision of Imm.Med.Serv. from November 23, 2000.
5. Copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest Institute.
6. Short descriptions of events - end of 1999 - beginning of 2000
7. Lev GUNIN - "The Source Of Our Problems"
8. Wider detailed description of events before December (Sept. - Nov. 2000)
9. Resume of the visit to MCI December 4 2000.
10. The whole immigration story
11. Other English publications on Internet about persecution of family GUNIN
To Human Rights Organizations
(AI, HRW, UNHRC, etc.)
December, 2000. Montreal, QUEBEC
- Introductory Document
From Lev GUNIN Full immigration story: {www.total.net/~leog/Righs/LevGunin/indexX.htm}
former refugee claimant
(tel. 514-49-1294) December 2 2000
Introductory Note
1. Because violations and injustice are so outraged and unbelievable that it is difficult to speak
about them without emotions, I decided not to write a special description of events. Instead I
am handing you over a number of documents, which will speak for themselves.
2. Below I am listing these documents with comments and explanations about each.
Manipulation and falsification of medical data is the most dangerous and tremendous violation
of human rights. Most letters from Immigration were anonymous, but only few marked here on
that regard as examples.
Document 1:
Complaint on Immigration actions and decisions submitted to Immigration Complain Board
(like attempts to cause damage to victim's heath). Theoretically falsification and blatant
manipulation of medical data can lead to a forcible treatment from diseases, which one do not
have (it could be lethal).
Document 2:
Complaint against refusal to allow all my family members medical examinations.
Document 3:
My disagreement with the decision of Imm.Med.Serv. from November 23, 2000.
Document 4-a:
A shortened description of events, which manifested abuse of power, ungrounded secrecy,
misconduct and criminal manipulation of medical data. Document 4-b is a supplementary
description about the source of my problems. It is crucial for understanding the mechanism
behind the persecutions.
Document 5:
Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest Institute.
Document 6:
A wider description of events, with more astonishing and outraged details. This document is
not enclosed but available on Internet: {www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo201127.html}
Document 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d:
M-me Roy's rulings: illegal intervention into medical matters by non-medic, violation of the
procedural requirements of the marriage interview stage, prejudicial ruling of IMS before my
mother's medical exams for the landed immigrant status.
Document 8:
Complaint to Immigration about extension's of employment authorization sabotage from May
15 2000.
Document 9:
Resume of my visit to MCI December 4 2000.
Document 10-a
The anonymous letter from MCI mentioned in Documents 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Document 10-b:
another letter (one page) demanding a donation to the Royal Victoria Hospital was included in
the same envelope as the "TB letter".
Document 11
An order-receipt (payment) to pay for the blood test for syphilis, which was never done.
Another document (Document 12) shows that dr. Giannalis uses this laboratory to evaluate
test samples, taken at his office. The blood test for syphilis was not required by Immigration in
my case. It was also mentioned that a patient must only appear for this test in the CDL
Laboratories, in other words samples taken outside CDL Lab are not admitting for evaluation
for syphilis.
Document 12
Strum creatinine test's form from CDL Lab form for my mother. The test was ordered by dr.
Giannakis on Immigration's request and the result was: in norm.
Document 13-a
Front page of the IMS ruling from November 23 letter (received on November 28).
Corresponds to Document 3. Also was mentioned in Documents 1, 4, 6. Document 13-b is the
text of the internal part of the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
Document 14-a
Ruling from IMS to my mother, Elisabetha Epstein from January 17 2000. This document is
anonymous, no names, telephone numbers. Document 14-b is the text of the internal part of
the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
Document 15-a
Ruling from IMS to my mother, Elisabetha Epstein from June 30 2000. This document is
anonymous, no names, telephone numbers. Document 15-b is the text of the internal part of
the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
Document 15 plus
September 2000 - letter from IMS ordering another urine test and then a visit to an urologist.
Document 16
An offensive letter from my mother's new immigration officer from September 18 2000.
Document 17
My mother's, Elisabetha Epstein, response (September 20 2000) to an offensive letter from
Immigration (see Document 16).
Document 18
Copy of the positive response to our humanitarian appeal
Document 19
An order from January 11 2000 to my wife, Alla, to undergo the medical examination. Only my
wife's name mentioned in this letter. This letter is a proof that refusing to include all family
members Immigration stalling the completion of our file almost one year now.
Document 20
An order from October 26 2000 to me and my daughter Marta to undergo medical
examination. Was submitted in contradiction with the previous Immigration's assurance that
only my wife has to undergo medical examination.
Document 21-a
X-ray result from Le Centre Radiologique Clarke from November 14 2000, which tremendously
contradict the Immigration's x-ray from November 01 2000 evaluation. In response to TB
double-check request (see Document 21-b) it said "NIL ACTIVE". The film was evaluated by 3
medical doctors, which came to the same "nil active" conclusion. I was seen and evaluated by
2 medical doctors since October 29, who found the TB suspicion ridiculous.
Document 22
X-ray result from November 22 1994 from the Centre Hospitalier Reddy Memorial. On request
of W. Brzezinska, M.D. if there is recent pulmonary infiltrate it said "no recent pulmonary
infiltrate shown".
Document 23
Mr. Z. JAST's certificate for Immigration in relation to the x-ray dispute.
Document 24
Internet-links to two publications, which might accelerate persecutions.
Document 25-a,b
IMS final decision in my mother's case from Dec. 5 2000.
Document 26
Document 27
List of "civil" events. Relates to our will to contribute to the society.
Lev GUNIN December 2 2000 Montreal
COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER ONE
To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) November 30 2000
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
This is the complaint on actions and decisions, which my advisers and I found inadmissible, like
attempts to cause damage to my mother's and my heath. Theoretically falsification and blatant
manipulation of medical data can lead to a forcible treatment from diseases, which one do not
have (it could be lethal).
.
I submit you 5 documents. The First is this one. Second is a complaint against refusal to allow
all my family members medical examinations half a year ago. Third is my disagreement with the
decision of Immigration Health Services from November 23, 2000. Fourth is a shortened
description of events, which manifested abuse of power, ungrounded secrecy, misconduct and
criminal manipulation of medical data. Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest
Institute. Sixth is a wider description of events, with more astonishing and outraged details.
However, because of the length of the Sixth document its submission by fax could be found
offensive, so, please, tell me where to send it by post or e-mail.
I would like to know:
A) Who made all mentioned in six documents unjust decisions (names, position, what their role
in my file).
B) On what ground (law, paragraph, circumstances).
C) Who made a decision, based on a single x-ray: to consider me a potential TB carrier and
submitted it not to Mr. Giannakis, M.D. but to the Royal Victoria Hospital, depriving me and
doctor Giannakis of a minimal choice to choose where to turn for further evaluation. Is the MCI
radiology unit a part of IMS (ImmMedSrv)?
D) If the x-ray film (made at MCI) could be obtained for copying. My legal advisers and me - we
want to ask you to show it to us at 1010 St Antoine, Montreal. We want to check:
E) If a) there is any technical defect or underwear shadow, which was offensively interpreted
as "TB" b) this x-ray matches my body constitution c) an obviously normal result was blatantly
interpreted as "abnormal". We would like to be given a permission to take this film or its copy to
medical specialists to determine it.
F) How all contradictions, deceptions, violations can be explained (each event).
G) Examples: a) Half a year ago IMS officials refused to submit us ruling and forms for medical
examination for all family members assuring us that only my wife has to go through them. Now
in contradiction with what was said before they ordered my younger daughter and me (now
omitting my older daughter) to do examinations. B) Why my mother's file was illegally attached
to mine. c) How could so many ungrounded medical tests be ruled for my mother, keeping her
more then one year (!) in limbo, etc.
H) How all such decisions might be appealed?
I) Has my mother and me same IMS agents or agents of the same unit? Who are supervisors
of all agents, attached to our files (including Immigration Medical Services - IMS).
J) How to reach them?
K) If Immigration's agents (IMS included) are subjects of Criminal Code - or they are
completely uncontrolled and impunitive.
L) If they are not (impunitive) what is the way to complain about
1. Deliberate damage of my (my family's) financial, social, and psychological situation.
2. Criminal manipulation of the medical data
M) How could I know if W. Brzezinska's M.D. rapport with a "concern" about my health
presents not only in my mother's but in my file as well?
N) Why my file is proceeding not on Montreal - as normally - but in Ottawa?
I must warn you that I will contact police or RCMP in case of any further anonymous calls
("private call" indication) from Immigration and will disregard any letters, until they will not be
signed and carry the name and phone number of the person who is responsible for the
decision. All anonymous telephone calls, which accuse me of concealing a number of
infectious diseases, must be stopped. Anonymous letters from hospitals on behalf of
Immigration with same insinuations are unacceptable as well. I have also received a receipt for
a blood test for syphilis, which I never did, from a Lab, where I never went. I was also called by
two other laboratories, which pretend that I did tests for infectious diseases, and this is not
true. All such provocation must be stopped immediately!
.
All 5 (or 6) documents must be evaluated to consider and answer my complaint. Please,
answer all questions, which arise from the documents. I ask you to respond to this complaint in
writing. However, another solution is just to consider my case as "finished" with no further
demands. Will appreciate your cooperation.
Yours,
Lev GUNIN
November 30 2000
Chronology in GUNINS' case
November 1994
refugee claim
March 1997
refugee claim rejected.
(In the negative decision our refugee
claim description was severely
distorted; document includes such
direct and indirect statements as a)
nothing bad could happen in such a
beautiful country like Israel, b) people
who were taken to Israel for
Sochnut's expense are property of
Israel, c) people who refused to
change their believes and opinions
are guilty on persecutions themselves
because provoked them c) no
minimum of confidence). January
1998
- Federal Court closing our case on a
ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no
minimal confidence" ruling.
January 2000
- positive decision in response to our
humanitarian appeal.
March 2000
an interview lead to the Certificat de
selectione du Quebec issuing by
Quebec's Immigration
March 2000
bureaucratic humiliation and blatant
manipulation of medical data by
Federal Immigration starts to torpid
the completion of the case
Chronology in
Elisabetha GUNIN (Epstein's)
case:.1994
refugee claim + Wanda Brzezinska,
M.D. makes a false report (see Doc.
4b, 7a, 7b).
March 1997
refugee claim rejected.
January 1998
- Federal Court closing our case on a
ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no
minimal confidence" ruling.
November 1998
marriages a Canadian citizen
November 22 1999
my mother's marriage interview.
Nov. 23, Madame Helene ROY
replaces the initiative negative
decision, based on "medical
concerns" (dr. Brzezinska's rapport),
by a positive one.
January 2000 - Certificat de
selectione du Quebec was issued for
my mother.
January 2000, a ruling from IMS
ordering my mother additional tests:
strum creatinine (blood test) and
echocardiogram.
June 30, 2000 - IMS ridiculous
demand of a resume from "the last
visit to cardiologist".
July 27 2000
- rapport of Dr. Gordon Creenstein
(anatomy, not pathology) was
submitted to Immigration.
September 2000
another letter from IMS ordering
another urine test and then a visit to
an urologist.
September 19 2000
offensive letter from Immigration
officer. December 2000
IMS final negative decision confirming
the illegal prejudicial decision from
Nov. 99.
- DOCUMENT NUMBER TWO
To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237)
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
A COPY OF DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO IMMIGRATION
ON MAY 15 2000
By this letter we ask Immigration's agent assigned to my file to make a special ruling to order medical examinations for all members
of our family, not only for Alla GUNIN, my wife. As we know from our legal advisers, this procedure is required for all family members
for the landed immigrant's status. If you insist that only my wife has to do the medical examination, please, send us a written warrant.
We have a well-grounded suspicion that somebody might use the delay in ordering the medical examination for all members of our
family for artificial sabotage of issuing us the landed immigrant's status. We will appreciate your cooperation.
YOURS TRULY
Lev GUNIN
in name of family GUNIN
The 15 of May 2000
COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER THREE
To Immigration's Complaints Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) December 1 2000
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
I disagree with the Immigration Medical Services decision "ev 7001-850497Z" (with date mentioned: November 23, 2000) from
Ottawa, received by me on November 29, 2000 (anonymous - no name or signature). The goal of this ruling is not to establish the
medical truth but to put a hardship on my family (and me).
My arguments.
(See the decision's text - as it was red to me by dr. Giannakis - in Document N4: on the bottom)
1. The decision ruled that Mr. Giannakis's respond should be submitted before November 30, 2000. Why then the letter arrived only
on November 29? Does it mean that the date in the letter - "November 23" - was incorrect? Or the letter has not been sent in 2-3 days? Or - if it is known that a letter from Ottawa to Montreal goes 5-6 days - why then I was not given more time? I ask you to submit me an explanation what November 30 means and why not December 10 or January 15? I want to know how the agent justified that particular date. Was that small misconduct planned in advance?
2. The suggestion that somebody else went and did the x-ray instead of me was another serious assault. That suggestion was made in ignorance of the fact that on Clark Lab's official (original!) paper IMS (Immigration Medical Service) officer could see my name, date of birth, telephone number, name of the ordering physician, and the number of my medical card (which - everybody knows - has my photo on it). Besides, it mentioned the "MILD PECTUS EXCAVATUM", a cosmetic defect, which I have since birth. Besides, it is known that the film itself has a negative image of the whole ID data! Then this ungrounded abuse was based on nothing and went far beyond any medical or even legal matter.
3. The demand to send an original film from the November 14 x-ray in the light of two above disputed demands might be ungrounded. This x-ray film was already seen by 3 medical doctors: the radiologist at the Clark Lab, dr. Jast (who referred me and evaluated the film), and dr. Giannakis. All three came to a conclusion that there is NOTHING abnormal, not a slightest possibility.
Both dr. Jast and Giannakis also examined me. The official conclusion is NIL ACTIVE. Besides, it was informally evaluated by a chest specialist: with the same conclusion. What else the IMS agent needs? I have a well-grounded concern that 1) he/she will find a black spot even on the whitest paper - because he/she is determined to; and 2) after he/she will find "a black spot" the film will vanish, but not the IMS's "evaluation". Immigration pretended already many times (dates, documents might be provided) that lost our applications, medical data, etc.
4. It was an abuse to mention that "After overview if necessary applicant may have to be referred to the chest specialist." It is a prejudgment and prejudice. "...if necessary", "may" are just a form. It is a very clear message that he/she will not let me alone! Why to speak about next medical procedure before seeing the x-ray?
Lev GUNIN Dec. 01 2000
Copy - DOCUMENT NUMBER FIVE
From Lev GUNIN ( 514-499-1294)
Document 5
LETTER TO THE MONTREAL CHEST INSTITUTE - A Copy
(The letter was submitted on November 09 in respond to an anonymous letter from the Montreal Chest Institute received on November 6 2000; below you can find a modified version (November 12-14), which was submitted to the same destination on November 15).
.
Lev GUNIN
address
telephone
From Lev GUNIN to anonymous person, author of the letter (the copy of the letter is enclosed).
Montreal Chest Institute
3666 St-Urbain
Montreal, QUEBEC H2X 2P4
Sir or Lady! Please, forward this letter to an appropriate Immigration department, which you mentioned on page 1 of your letter.
First of all, any suggestions that I could be infected by tuberculosis were ridiculous. I had some other suggestions, but later a medical doctor I spoke to - as well as my legal advisers - told me that the only answer of what happened is that Immigration might just make a false report on my x-ray. Besides, a x-ray could not determine whether or not any of such shadow means tuberculosis, or simply any kind of pneumonia, bronchitis, or a combination (see medical books). Any conclusions based on only one x-ray are ridiculous, partial, and prejudicial. In modern time - when there are so many flu infections accompanied by pneumonic consequences (side effects) such conclusions are a complete nonsense. It is obvious that your decision to attach me to the Infectious Disease Unit (IDU) before you have a 100 percent proof of any tuberculosis infection and initiate an appropriate legal procedure was a drastic misconduct. The only admissible way to handle the situation was (before sending me to the Infectious Disease Unit)
1) to request a second opinion in existing x-ray
2) to send me a letter for my physician for another x-ray.
On November 14 I did another x-ray. It revealed that there is no any suspicious shadow, no abnormalities - and (as my medical advisers told) could not be 2 weeks before, especially tuberculosis-like shadows. Was my x-ray photo (a negative) replaced by somebody else's or IMS (Immigration Medical Services) just falsified the reading of my x-rays, - I do not know. That all is a subject of a criminal investigation.
Because I am depressed, I did not notice that the Montreal Chest Institute (MCI) belongs to Royal Victoria Hospital, an institution I had several formal conflicts with. Somebody from the hospital's administration used to submit me an offensive number of requests for donation to the hospital even after I have sent a note that by then was on welfare. The hospital's administration also did an attempt to extort money from me for services, which were covered by Medicare. In that hospital I heard several times that people like me are "illegal in Canada and should not be given medical help "for the cost of Canadians". Then I was treated by negligence at the emergency room, then - it was a medical misconduct over my CSST claim. Dr. Evenson's M.D. (Royal Victoria) secretary played games with me, actually denying an appointment from May till November 2000. A number of legal and medical violations used to take place there. And in all such minor incidents immigration matters or even Immigration itself were involved. One of immigration specialists advised me not to turn to Royal Victoria because that hospital is "enormously influenced by Immigration".
The fact that a page with a request for a donation to the Royal Victoria Hospital was included into your letter was another outraged abuse.
Eventually it is possible that doctor Giannakis had sent me for x-ray not to "La Cite" - as my mom and my wife, - or another medical institution but to Montreal Chest Institute because he received an order (not a request but an order, which he could not disobey as an Immigration representative) from Immigration to do so.
By this letter I declare that I am considering your way of handling the situation dangerously offensive and depriving me of my constitutional rights because of the above mentioned as well as the next reasons:
FIRST, I will DISREGARD any anonymous letters like your present one until a letter from you would be signed, addressed from a real person with his/her clear name and telephone number.
SECOND, you have no legal rights to treat me as a contagious carrier until an undeniable medical proof is established.
THIRD, by sending me to the IDU you may expose me to contacts with real infected carriers.
FOURTH, you are not a police, Immigration, secret police or death squads to a) act secretly-anonymously refusing to sign your letter,
b) to write me anything like "by Immigration law, you are requested (...)". Since you are not immigration layers or Immigration officials, you are forbidden to judge in a case like mine what Immigration law requires. Such a statement in a case like mine must be submitted only directly from Immigration. If you are part of Immigration (officially) - then my rights were violated when I wasn't informed about that before doing the x-ray at your unit.
FIFTH, my legal advisors, and me, we are confident that you have no legal rights to deprive me of choosing between medical institutions for medical tests or evaluation. You can not bring me to do a test or an evaluation exclusively in your institution by a forceful order. This will violate my basic human rigDocument 5hts. Even KGB had no official rights to oblige anybody who was not an imprisoned suspect or convinced criminal to do a medical evaluation without some sort of choice.
SIXTH, I would ask Immigration to allow me do another x-ray before doing anything else.
SEVENTH, evaluating my case, some human rights activists think that somebody at Immigration is so furious, so angry about me and that such an outraged misconduct was demonstrated in my case that Immigration is eventually ready to do any damage to my health through blood, e-ray tests or sadistic bureaucratic humiliations.
EIGHTH, I think that the most realistic explanations of an eventual abnormality, which could be seen on the x-ray picture, were:
1) eventual shadow from the underwear, which I did not remove from on beneath of the hospital robe, and the robe itself, which I've putted on in a wrong way
2) a dust spot or another kind of essence on the hospital robe
3) traces of somehow inhaled gas different from air
4) reading of a normal x-ray (with no abnormalities) was deliberately falsified by IMS
NINTH, before doing the e-ray I received a strange call from Immigration, through which I was accused of refusing a "medical treatment".
TENTH, your medical ethics should not allow you to send me to the IDU before making your own medical conclusions (decision) based not on Immigration's rapport but of your own evaluation of my x-ray test result.
ELEVENTH, my legal advisors have told me that I have rights to ask for a possibility to discuss my x-ray result with any of your medical institution specialists dedicated to such evaluations before going further. It is you (on behalf of Immigration or not - it is does not matter) who are sending me to Infectious Disease Unit. Because you are sending me to such a unit, you can not deny me such a discussion. I would like to see the x-ray original, which was made in your institution on November 1 2000 - and also show Document
5it to my medical advisors.
TWELVETH, I prefer not to go through further tests or evaluations in immigration matters (for medical purposes - it's different) at your institution.
Yours truly,
Lev GUNIN
November 2000 Montreal
- Document Number Nine
RESUME of my visit to Montreal Chest Institute on December 2 2000
OBJECT Of the Visit:
1) to receive an official result (medical resume-evaluation) of my x-ray test done on November 1 2000
2) find out where is the original film and try to obtain it for making a copy
REASONS:
November 23 2000. I have managed to find out who sent me the anonymous letter (described in Documents 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6) from
Montreal Chest Institute (MCI). It was M-me Lucy Gefroy (Jefroi or Joyfroid?). According to the same sources: she's never seen that x-ray. I left her my message on 849-5211 (ex 2166). She called me at 2.15 p.m. anonymously ("private call" indication) - and asked me what I want. She confessed that she is M-me Lucy only when I told her that recognized her voice comparing it to her answering machine message. That only could tell about her insincerity and guilt. I spoke with her in French, but when I did not know some medical terminology in French, and used English, she pretended that does not speak English at all. However, when I switched to French again, she started to speak bad English, which I could not understand. It was difficult to get along with her, but finally I convinced her to speak French again - and asked her a couple of questions.
Here they are:
- Did you see the x-ray?
- Yes, I did.
- What kind of a shadow did you see, mild? bright? what its form? On the right or left side?
- I can not tell you.
- Where is this x-ray film now?
- I can not tell you.
- Is it at MCI?
- Immigration took it from us, and, I think, it was lost.
- What do you mean - lost?
- Vanished somewhere at Immigration.
- Can I obtain the result?
- Listen, your case here is closed. You don't have to come here. Not any more. We disabled our previous letter's order. Bye.
She disconnected.
RESULTS of the visit.
At MCI's medical archive employers did not find any records about my x-ray in the computer. They told me that a mistake might
occur - because if even I did the x-ray for Immigration, its data (result, date, etc.) since November 1 had to be entered into the
registry.
Before I could enter room number 28 a small blond man appeared and approached me as in espionage novels (how could he
react so quickly, who warned him during my descending from the second to the first floor?) "You will receive nothing here. And you will be prosecuted for refusing to see the doctor, - he shouted to me. "I was told that my x-ray has vanished, and came to check, and also to obtain the result". He became almost pale - so visually he was frightened, as if he lost a million of dollars. He disappeared behind the gray door and soon came out with an envelope (my name and photo on it) and signs of a deep relief. "Here it is, - he told.
- You must visit a doctor because you have tuberculosis". "Are you confident about TB you mentioned?" - "Yes, I am". - "I was told that my case here is cancelled - and I don't have to appear". - "Nobody could tell you that. You will be prosecuted for your refusal!"
"Your conclusions about the x-ray was a mistake, Sir, and the film reveals a technical defect or a shadow of underwear, which I did not remove. Take a look - and let me see". - "It is possible. But the law says that you must see a doctor anyway, if even this is our mistake". - "What law, what paragraph? Then - I have a constitutional right to choose another institution, not yours, to pay such a visit". Then he started screaming on me: "You don't want to pay, ah? You don't want to donate to our hospital? You came to Canada and want to enjoy our good life without giving anything back? If you don't pay by your fucken money - you'll pay by your fucken ass!" - I tried to say "This is not only because of money, this is because I can not trust you!" but he kept screaming on me - and I left him. Before I left the hospital I could find out that there is no official result in my case. No paper, no evaluation. Only a checkpoint on the envelope, in category "4". What if somebody just made a wrong hand movement - and checked a wrong place?
I did not go to MCI any more. Later I discovered through other ways that the category 4 means "pulmonary noodles", which was completely inapplicable to me!
RESUME: Anyone can see that drastic misconduct toward me (or in general), and hatred towards me (or towards all
immigration-seekers in general?) could explain what's going on in that institution and what happened around my x-ray.
REMARK: This is not a documentary story. To show the emotional impression I have distorted some small details. This is more like a literary piece. However, it is precise in revealing what we are dealing with. Also the words of Madam Lucy and Mister Doctor were cited with a precise accuracy.
Yours truly,
Lev GUNIN
Лев Гунин. Приложения к работе "ГУЛАГ ПАЛЕСТИНЫ"
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ ВТОРОЕ
ГЛОБАЛЬНЫЙ ТЕРОР ПРОТИВ ВСЕХ
НЕСОГЛАСНЫХ С СИОНИСТКОЙ ИДЕОЛОГИЕЙ
В своей статье в "CANADIAN JEWISH NEWS" "WHY I AM ANTI-ANTI-ZIONIST" (июнь, 2001) один из главных сионистских идеологов Канады, активист, журналист, постоянный корреспондент монреальской "THE GAZETTE", приравнял несогласие с идеологией современного сионизма
к антисемитизму, враждебному отношению к Израилю и даже терроризму. Подобная позиция высказывается с начала 1990-х годов израильскими лидерами и лидерами мирового еврейства, главными еврейскими газетами мира и наиболее влиятельными еврейскими экстремистами. В статье "Internet the New Domain of Middle East Conflict" в газете "Canadian Jewish news" (December, 2000) намеренно сваливаются в кучу какая бы то ни была критика Израиля в Интернет, подрывная деятельность и хакерские демарши. "Безобидные" взломы израильских вэб сайтов, в результате которых не пострадал ни один человек, идеологическая борьба с сионизмом в легальных рамках, частная критика государства Израиль в Интернет - все объявляется "сибер-терроризмом", приравнивается к терроризму уголовному (к взрыву бомб - и т.д.), вслед за чем следует обещание военного ответа Израиля. От имени еврейского государства статья в этом официальном органе еврейских властей Канады обещает военный ответ на любую критику государства Израиль. Еще более вопиющим звучит признание в том, что израильская военная машина стоит за "контрпропагандой" и за деятельностью про-израильских хакеров. При этом враждебные Израилю хакеры объявляются террористами, а израильские хакеры героями! Эта статья - открытое запугивание всех, кто осмеливается критиковать политику и идеологию государства Израиль в Интернет. Можно не сомневаться, что это официальная точка зрения как самих израильских властей, так и еврейских лидеров диаспоры на сегодняшний день.
Таким образом, ситуация менялась так: сначала (еще совсем недавно - в 1970-х) считалось "необязательным", чтобы все евреи поголовно были ярыми сионистами. Потом для того, чтобы оставаться в рамках еврейской общинной жизни, стало требоваться скрывать свое несогласие с сионистской идеологией или даже выражать свои сионистские взгляды. И, наконец, теперь быть сионистами обязательно не только для евреев, но и для не евреев тоже, в противном случае тебе грозят серьезные неприятности. Итак, еврейский тоталитаризм завершил свою эволюции, развившись к настоящему времени в свою крайнюю форму, с тенденцией к мировому контролю и тотальному промыванию мозгов. Наиболее символичный демарш еврейских экстремистов - суд и глумление над британским историком Дэйвидом Ирвингом.
В следующем тексте на английском языке речь идет о мировом заговоре еврейских экстремистов, охвативших тотальным контролем все средства массовой информации, академические учреждения, издательства, Интернет, и так далее, с целью не допустить ни появления ни одной книги, ни одной статьи, ни одного комментария, ни одного вэб сайта, расходящихся с официальной сионистской доктриной по любому ряду вопросов, представляющему для сионизма тот или иной интерес: по истории, религии, археологии, политологии, и так далее. Речь идет о мировой сионистской цензуре. Своих целей сионисты добиваются через суды, травлю авторов, избиения, убийства, запугивания, подкуп, преследования. Такие еврейские экстремистские организации как Анти-Дефамационная Лига, Лига Защиты Евреев, Бней Брит, Институт Против Терроризма, а также организации "общего" типа, такие, как Всемирный Еврейский Конгресс и другие, занимаются отслеживанием, выявлением всех, не согласных с современной официальной сионистской идеологией, составлением досье на этих людей, и в дальнейшем - преследованием последних. Те, кто открыто выражает свое несогласие с сионистской идеологией, сталкиваются с разными неприятностями: с объявлением их фашистами, с выдвинутыми против них еврейскими организациями судебными исками, с отстранением от работы (особенно в академических кругах), с запретом на их публикации, с депортацией из той или иной страны или с запретом на въезд в ту или иную страну, и так далее. Все это мы узнаем из следующего текста, помещенного про-демократическим сайтом Mowchuk, который принадлежит активисту Мани Саиду.
Помещение следующих материалов нами не означает, что мы согласны со всеми их взглядами и позициями, но ситуация настолько осложнилась и еврейский мировой тоталитаризм настолько укрепился, что любое, альтернативное ему, мнение, имеет право на то, чтобы быть узнанным. Из верности демократическим принципам мы также даем некоторые материалы, связанные с альтернативным нашему мнением. По ним читатель может составить свое впечатление об уровне и накале идеологической борьбы, какая может быть вполне сравнима с накалом холодной войны. Разница только в том, что в холодной войне друг другу противостояли государства. А в холодной войне, развязанной современным сионизмом, государства Запада стоят не на стороне своих граждан - жертв сионистской агрессии и цензуры, а на стороне злейшего врага европейской культуры: государства Израиль.